Skip to main content
PGIM Quantitative Solutions LogoPGIM Quantitative Solutions Logo
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our History
    • The Team
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Contact Us
  • All Insights
    • ESG
    • Market Views
  • ESG Overview
    • ESG Insights
    • ESG Policy
    • Stewardship and Governance
  • Overview of Solutions
    • Quantitative Equity
    • Multi Asset
    • PGIM Wadhwani
    • PGIM DC Solutions
  • Client Log In
  • Careers
QMA Global Multi-Asset
Market Views

China Regulatory Crackdown Takes A Toll On Tech And Education SectorsChinaRegulatoryCrackdownTakesATollOnTechAndEducationSectors

By Manoj Rengarajan — Sep 8, 2021

10 mins

Share
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy URL
Read More

Share

China has embarked on an unprecedent regulatory crackdown on several companies across a range of sectors since the cancellation of the ANT group's IPO in November 2020. The objective behind the tougher regulatory regime is to achieve China's long-term goals of common prosperity, technology independence and the creation of a more sustainable economy. The timing of these changes is likely being driven by the upcoming 20th Party Congress in 2022, when President Xi Jingping expects to extend his leadership beyond the previous two term limit, which was abolished by the National People's Congress in 2018.

Some significant examples of regulatory and policy actions that comprise the crackdown:

Antitrust Crackdown on Big-Tech: The State Administration of Market Regulation (SAMR) launched an anti-trust probe into China's internet companies. Alibaba was the first to be subjected to the regulatory probe due to its actions that restricted merchants on its platform from doing business or running promotions on other platforms: the probe resulted in the company paying a record $2.8 billion fine. Subsequently, almost all big tech firms were required to rectify their antitrust practices. Almost all of these companies have now been fined by the SAMR for failing to disclose mergers, making vendors sign exclusivity contracts and engaging in false advertising, among other violations.

Further on August 17th, SAMR introduced draft regulation that banned unfair competition among internet companies that is expected to be implemented this year. The draft rules target anticompetitive practices, such as false advertising, fake reviews, unfair competition, data protection and consumer privacy. The state regulator has also said it is studying proposals to further ensure the rights of drivers who work for ride-hailing companies and to step up oversight of the online streaming industry. The unprecedent speed and degree of the regulatory changes has had an adverse impact on the stocks of these internet and eCommerce companies with index heavyweights such as Alibaba, Tencent, Meituan, JD.com and Baidu declining more than 20% year to date (through August 18th). Given that technology stocks dominate the MSCI China index, China has been among the worst-performing markets in EM this year.

Data Security: Data security has also become a major concern for the communist party. In recent policy documents, the government has designated “data” as a factor of production on par with land, labor, capital and technology. To oversee data security, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) was formed in 2014. The agency oversees the country's censorship apparatus and also secures data of Chinese citizens that is collected by private companies. To that end, a cybersecurity law was implemented in 2017 that banned domestic data from being stored overseas and marks a shift in China's data strategy away from a narrow focus on security and towards a multi-pronged approach balancing security concerns and economic benefits. The ride-hailing app Didi was one of the biggest victims of the country's drive to enforce data security. The CAC suspended Didi's app on July 2nd, (just two days after the stock started trading on the NASDAQ), for violating security protocols. Subsequently, two other apps, Full Truck Alliance and Kanzhun, suffered the same fate.

China Regulatory Crackdown Punishes Chinese Equities

After School Tutoring (AST): In July, General Office of CPC Central Committee and General Office of the State Council jointly announced the "double-reduction" policy to reduce the burden of homework and after-school tutoring (AST) on students at the compulsory education stage (grades 1-9). A significant driver for the attack on the education sector has been demographics. China announced a three-child policy in May 2021 to address its aging and shrinking workforce. However, the cost of raising children has risen significantly, and one of the main drivers for this has been after-school tutoring, which saddles parents with exorbitant fees and discourages them from having more children. There was also a sense that after-school tutoring was contributing to inequality in Chinese society, as only the wealthy are able to afford tutoring. The government has also been concerned about the impact on children's health from all the additional work involved in attending after-school tutoring. Some of these tutoring institutes also held classes on weekends and summer/winter vacations further adding to the burden on children. Earlier this year Xí Jìnpíng held a conference on the health of children in the education sector and told committee members that the tutoring industry had become “a stubborn malady.” The regulations also address other issues, such as false advertising and aggressive expansion within the sector that was starting to hurt customers.

The regulations were harsher than expected with continuous monitoring by the government and the targets to effectively reduce the burden on students in one year and to achieve a meaningful outcome in three years. The new policy effectively banned academic AST for grades 1-9 for weekends, public holidays and summer/winter holidays, allows no new approvals of any academic AST agencies and requires existing agencies to re-register as non-profit organizations. Academic ASTs are also banned from IPOs or any fund raising, and existing listed AST companies are not allowed to raise money to invest in AST or merge with or acquire academic AST assets via share issuance or cash. This led to a sharp sell-off in stocks within the sector with Tal Education, the largest stock within the index, declining almost 70%.

In addition to the examples mentioned above there have also been several policy interventions addressing social matters, including climate change, property prices and healthcare.

The speed and breadth of the policy changes has created an environment of uncertainty for investors. Tencent Holdings has said the industry should brace for more regulation and uncertainty. This has resulted in Chinese stocks underperforming their global peers. Also, given that Chinese stocks have the largest weight (~40%) in the MSCI emerging market index, they have been the most significant contributor to EM's underperformance relative to developed market equities. If prior regulatory crackdowns by the Chinese government are any indicator, it is likely that the ongoing regulatory crackdown continues in the near future as the Chinese Communist Party forces its corporate behemoths to align behind its long-term strategic goals.

Read More
  • By Manoj RengarajanCFA & Portfolio Manager, PGIM Quantitative Solutions
  • About Us

    • Overview
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our History
    • The Team
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Insights

    • Overview
    • ESG
    • Market Views
  • ESG

    • Overview
    • Insights
    • ESG Policy
    • Stewardship and Governance
  • Solutions

    • Overview
    • Quantitative Equity
    • Multi Asset
    • PGIM Wadhwani
    • PGIM DC Solutions
PGIM Quantitative Solutions Logo
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Center
  • Accessibility Help
  • Cookie Preference Center

For Professional Investors only. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.

The content and materials presented here are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect of any products or services to any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC (PGIM Quantitative Solutions or PGIM Quant), formerly known as QMA LLC, is an SEC-registered investment adviser and a wholly-owned subsidiary of PGIM, Inc. (PGIM), the principal asset management business of Prudential Financial, Inc. (PFI) of the United States of America. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training. PFI of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. 

In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V. with registered office: Gustav Mahlerlaan 1212, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PGIM Netherlands B.V. is authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands (Registration number 15003620) and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. 

These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). PGIM Quantitative Solutions, PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. are indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of PGIM. These materials are not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local or international law or regulation.

In Japan, investment management services are made available by PGIM Japan, Co. Ltd., ("PGIM Japan"), a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator with the Financial Services Agency of Japan. In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 (paragraph (a) to (i) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571). In Singapore, information is issued by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“PGIM Singapore”), a Singapore investment manager that is licensed as a capital markets service license holder by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and an exempt financial adviser. These materials are issued by PGIM Singapore for the general information of “institutional investors” pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”) and “accredited investors” and other relevant persons in accordance with the conditions specified in Sections 305 of the SFA. In South Korea, information is issued by PGIM Quantitative Solutions, which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean qualified institutional investors on a cross-border basis.

PGIM, PGIM Quantitative Solutions logo and the Rock design are service marks of PFI and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.

© 2023 PGIM Quantitative Solutions. All Rights Reserved.
 

You are viewing this page in preview mode.

Edit Page