Skip to main content
PGIM Quantitative Solutions LogoPGIM Quantitative Solutions Logo
  • About Us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our History
    • The Team
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Contact Us
  • All Insights
    • ESG
    • Market Views
  • ESG Overview
    • ESG Insights
    • ESG Policy
    • Stewardship and Governance
  • Overview of Solutions
    • Quantitative Equity
    • Multi Asset
    • PGIM Wadhwani
    • PGIM DC Solutions
  • Client Log In
  • Careers
Dartboard with multiple darts
Retirement

Target Date Fund Investors Not As Inert As Many BelieveTargetDateFundInvestorsNotAsInertAsManyBelieve

By Jeremy Stempien — Sep 15, 2021

10 mins

Share
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy URL
Read More

Share

For the past decade, the conventional wisdom in the defined contribution industry was that investors in target date funds (TDFs) typically do not respond to market volatility by trading into or out of their TDFs. Because of this investor “inertia,” to use the term of art favored by those in the DC space, any losses suffered by TDF investors during challenging markets usually were “paper” losses, which could be recouped as the markets recovered.

As it turns out, plan participants in TDF funds (the default investments for many defined contribution investors) are not as passive when market volatility spikes as they are believed to be. Research I conducted with my PGIM colleague, Ashley DiMayorca, reveals that when stock prices plummeted during the Global Financial Crisis and at the beginning of the COVID-19 recession, older TDF investors did, indeed, sell out of their funds. In doing so they suffered actual losses, impairing their chances of recovery and threatening a successful retirement outcome.

 

Dispelling the Myth of Investor Inertia

The market sell-offs during the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic provided windows into the behavior of TDF investors. In 2008, the vintage closest to its target retirement date was the 2010 Fund. According to Morningstar data, net flows in 2000-2010 funds averaged a positive $1.4 billion per quarter in the eight quarters prior to the market sell-off in October 2008. However, when the market dropped by 29% in the fourth quarter of 2008, outflows spiked. Net flows plummeted $785 million in the fourth quarter and $414 million in the first quarter 2009 before turning positive once again.1

More than a decade later, TDF investors ran to the exits again when the COVID-19 pandemic led the S&P 500 to drop by 34% in less than six weeks. As participants in 2020 funds were beginning to retire, net flows had been modestly negative in the eight quarters prior to the COVID-19-led market decline, averaging $1.6 billion in net outflows per quarter. However, when pandemic fears led the market to sell off in late February, TDF net outflows intensified, more than quadrupling to $6.6 billion in the first quarter of 2020.

Even more surprising was that many TDF investors who were still up to 10 years away from their target retirement date also pulled the plug on their TDFs in the market correction. Net flows for vintages five to 10 years before their target date are generally positive. But in the first quarter of 2020, net outflows were recorded in the 2025 and 2030 vintages (which likely encompasses investors around 53 years old and up). For example, 2025 Fund net flows had been consistently positive, but in the first quarter of 2020, they turned steeply negative with net outflows of $2.1 billion. (a turnaround of $5 billion from the previous quarter)

Trading Out of Fear and Necessity

While no one can say for sure why TDF investors traded out of their funds during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic, it is likely many of them exited their investments for the same reasons other investors trade out of theirs when markets are volatile. One of them is anxiety. Fearing further losses, investors often swap equity-heavy investments for those that historically are less vulnerable to market volatility. This appears to have been the case with TDF investors at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Alight Solutions, in February and March of 2020, 401(k) plan participants sold out of TDFs and traded into bond, stable value, and money market funds, with 64% of total inflows going into stable value funds in March.

Another reason plan participants may trade out of their TDF investments is that the economy leaves them little choice. Unemployment spiked during the recessions precipitated by the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, financial hardship often prompts many plan participants to tap their 401(k) plans to augment unemployment benefits. Older participants may find it particularly difficult to find jobs during periods of high unemployment, prompting them to leave the labor force and draw upon their retirement plans.

Whatever the reason for selling out of their target date funds, participants tend to pay a high price for doing so. Data shows these individuals not only “abandoned ship” when returns waned, many did not move back into TDFs as the markets recovered. This reduced the value of their retirement holdings which results in even gloomier retirement scenarios. The reduction in their retirement funds means some investors will see a precipitous drop in their income during their retirement years. Others might deplete their retirement funds altogether.

Lessons Learned

The myth of TDF investor inertia has had a profound impact on the managers of target date funds. Operating under the assumption that losses suffered by TDF investors were paper losses that could be recovered during benign markets, many fund managers upped their allocations to equities to a level that may not be prudent, particularly for older participants. A higher allocation to equities has the potential to deliver better returns (with all that entails for the growth of retirement assets), but it also may generate large losses that prompt TDF investors to trade out of their funds at inopportune times. Contrary to popular belief, these losses may not be easily recouped, potentially leaving investors without the funds they need to enjoy a fulfilling retirement.

Given the role TDFs play in realizing the goals of retirement investors (TDFs had $2 trillion in assets and accounted for 65% of DC participant-directed contributions in 2019),2 it behooves retirement plan fiduciaries to carefully consider the behavior of TDF participants when structuring their defined contribution plans. TDF investors make the same mistakes as investors in general. They trade out of higher-risk investments when asset values plunge, generating real losses that may not be fully recouped. As such, meeting the needs of plan participants may begin by recognizing that they are not stoic in the face of market dislocations and that less aggressive TDF series that offer more downside protection may be in the best interests of plan participants, especially those who are approaching retirement.

 

All mentions of defined contribution (DC) plans and DC plan participants refer to qualified US retirement plans and account holders in US defined contribution plans, respectively. Target date funds (TDFs) are predominantly a US investment vehicle and are not readily available outside of the United States.

 

1 Source: Morningstar Direct as of Mar 31, 2020.

2 Source: Morningstar Direct and Cerulli Associates.

Read More
  • By Jeremy StempienPortfolio Manager, PGIM Quantitative Solutions
  • About Us

    • Overview
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our History
    • The Team
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Insights

    • Overview
    • ESG
    • Market Views
  • ESG

    • Overview
    • Insights
    • ESG Policy
    • Stewardship and Governance
  • Solutions

    • Overview
    • Quantitative Equity
    • Multi Asset
    • PGIM Wadhwani
    • PGIM DC Solutions
PGIM Quantitative Solutions Logo
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Center
  • Accessibility Help
  • Cookie Preference Center

For Professional Investors only. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.

The content and materials presented here are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect of any products or services to any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC (PGIM Quantitative Solutions or PGIM Quant), formerly known as QMA LLC, is an SEC-registered investment adviser and a wholly-owned subsidiary of PGIM, Inc. (PGIM), the principal asset management business of Prudential Financial, Inc. (PFI) of the United States of America. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training. PFI of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. 

In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V. with registered office: Gustav Mahlerlaan 1212, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PGIM Netherlands B.V. is authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands (Registration number 15003620) and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. 

These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). PGIM Quantitative Solutions, PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. are indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of PGIM. These materials are not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local or international law or regulation.

In Japan, investment management services are made available by PGIM Japan, Co. Ltd., ("PGIM Japan"), a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator with the Financial Services Agency of Japan. In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 (paragraph (a) to (i) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571). In Singapore, information is issued by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“PGIM Singapore”), a Singapore investment manager that is licensed as a capital markets service license holder by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and an exempt financial adviser. These materials are issued by PGIM Singapore for the general information of “institutional investors” pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”) and “accredited investors” and other relevant persons in accordance with the conditions specified in Sections 305 of the SFA. In South Korea, information is issued by PGIM Quantitative Solutions, which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean qualified institutional investors on a cross-border basis.

PGIM, PGIM Quantitative Solutions logo and the Rock design are service marks of PFI and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.

© 2022 PGIM Quantitative Solutions. All Rights Reserved.
 

You are viewing this page in preview mode.

Edit Page